Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies ; : 34-41, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-962082

RESUMO

Objectives@#This cross-sectional study evaluates the degree of agreement between the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA2018) and 2020 Philippine Guideline (PG2020) treatment algorithms for the primary prevention of dyslipidemia among Filipinos.@*Methodology@#This review included 159 charts of statin-naive Filipinos who are 45-79 years old. Using risk profile and lipid measurements, statin treatment recommendation was determined through the PG2020 algorithm and ACC/AHA-ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus web application. The degree of agreement was measured by Cohen’s kappa statistic with the two algorithms as independent raters.@*Results@#A total of 159 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a slight agreement with a kappa coefficient of 0.209 or 4.4% (95% CI 0.078-0.340, p=0.003). Statin treatment was recommended in 69 out of 159 patients (43.4%) by the PG2020 overlapping with ACC/AHA2018 in 56 cases (81.2%). On the other hand, 109 cases (68.6%) were recommended for statin treatment by ACC/AHA2018 overlapping with PG2020 in only 51.4%. @*Conclusions@#The low degree of agreement between the two treatment algorithms highlights the key demographic and ethnic variations in dyslipidemia management necessitating outcome-based studies to translate these differences. Overestimation of ASCVD risk calculation in the ACC/AHA2018 and consideration of important, unique risk factors among Filipinos favors the applicability of the Philippine guideline.


Assuntos
Dislipidemias , Hipercolesterolemia , Algoritmos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Prevenção Primária
2.
Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies ; : 133-141, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-961980

RESUMO

Introduction@#Metformin has known mechanistic benefits on COVID-19 infection due to its anti-inflammatory effects and its action on the ACE2 receptor. However, some physicians are reluctant to use it in hypoxemic patients due to potential lactic acidosis. The primary purpose of the study was to determine whether metformin use is associated with survival. We also wanted to determine whether there is a difference in outcomes in subcategories of metformin use, whether at home, in-hospital, or mixed home/in-hospital use.@*Objectives@#This study aimed to determine an association between metformin use and mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus hospitalized for COVID-19 infection.@*Methodology@#This was a cross-sectional analysis of data acquired from the COVID-19 database of two tertiary hospitals in Cebu from March 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020. Hospitalized adult Filipino patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who tested positive for COVID-19 via RT-PCR were included and categorized as either metformin users or metformin non-users.@*Results@#We included 355 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the study, 186 (52.4%) were metformin users. They were further categorized into home metformin users (n=109, 30.7%), in-hospital metformin users (n=40, 11.3%), and mixed home/in-hospital metformin users (n=37, 10.4%). Metformin use was associated with a lower risk for mortality compared to non-users (p=0.001; OR=0.424). In-hospital and mixed home/in-hospital metformin users were associated with lower mortality odds than non-users (p=0.002; OR=0.103 and p=0.005; OR 0.173, respectively). The lower risk for mortality was noted in metformin, regardless of dosage, from 500 mg to 2 g daily (p=0.002). Daily dose between ≥1000 mg to <2000 mg was associated with the greatest benefit on mortality (p≤0.001; OR=0.252). The survival distributions between metformin users and non-users were statistically different, showing inequality in survival (χ2=5.67, p=0.017).@*Conclusion@#Metformin was associated with a lower risk for mortality in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus hospitalized for COVID-19 disease compared to non-users. Use of metformin in-hospital, and mixed home/in-hospital metformin use, was also associated with decreased risk for mortality. The greatest benefit seen was in those taking a daily dose of ≥1000 mg to <2000 mg.


Assuntos
Metformina , Diabetes Mellitus , COVID-19 , Mortalidade
3.
Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies ; : 5-13, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-961877

RESUMO

Objectives@#The COVID-19 pandemic has made a major impact on hospital services globally, including the care of persons with diabetes and endocrine disorders. The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiology of COVID-19 in the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies (AFES) member countries; to describe challenges, changes and opportunities in caring for patients with endocrine diseases, as well as in fellowship training programs, and endocrine-related research in the AFES countries.@*Methodology@#The AFES ASEAN Survey Of Needs in Endocrinology (AFES A.S.-O.N.E.) was an open-ended questionnaire that was sent to the presidents and representatives of the AFES member countries by email. Responses from Societies were collated and synthesized to obtain perspectives on the emergent issues in endocrinology in the Southeast Asian region during this pandemic.@*Results@#The burden of COVID-19 cases varied widely across the AFES member countries, with the least number of cases in Vietnam and Myanmar, and the greatest number of cases in either the most populous countries (Indonesia and the Philippines), or a country with the highest capability for testing (Singapore). The case fatality rate was also the highest for Indonesia and the Philippines at around 6%, and lowest for Vietnam at no fatalities. The percentage with diabetes among patients with COVID-19 ranged from 5% in Indonesia to 20% in Singapore, approximating the reported percentages in China and the United States. The major challenges in managing patients with endocrine diseases involved inaccessibility of health care providers, clinics and hospitals due to the implementation of lockdowns, community quarantines or movement control among the member countries. This led to disruptions in the continuity of care, testing and monitoring, and for some, provision of both preventive care and active management including surgery for thyroid cancer or pituitary and adrenal tumors, and radioactive iodine therapy. Major disruptions in the endocrine fellowship training programs were also noted across the region, so that some countries have had to freeze hiring of new trainees or to revise both program requirements and approaches to training due to the closure of outpatient endocrine clinics. The same observations are seen for endocrine-related researches, as most research papers have focused on the pandemic. Finally, the report ends by describing innovative approaches to fill in the gap in training and in improving patient access to endocrine services by Telemedicine.@*Conclusion@#The burden of COVID-19 cases and its case fatality rate varies across the AFES member countries but its impact is almost uniform: it has disrupted the provision of care for patients with endocrine diseases, and has also disrupted endocrine fellowship training and endocrine-related research across the region. Telemedicine and innovations in training have been operationalized across the AFES countries in an attempt to cope with the disruptions from COVID-19, but its over-all impact on the practice of endocrinology across the region will only become apparent once we conquer this pandemic.


Assuntos
Inquéritos e Questionários , Sudeste Asiático , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Philippine Journal of Internal Medicine ; : 1-4, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-998120

RESUMO

Introduction@#Before the advent of antibiotics, syphilis was known to be one of the most common infections affecting approximately 10% of the adult population worldwide. One of its devastating complications is neurosyphilis, which has a broad set of manifestations. Some patients may present with blurring of vision in the setting of an ongoing syphilis infection known as ocular syphilis. In the advent of increasing incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, co-infection with it may further obscure its manifestations or may even cause synergistic effects.@*Case Presentation@#Presenting a case of a 26-year-old male patient who complained of bilateral fronto-occipital headache with progressive blurring of vision and scaly reddish to brown maculopapular lesions affecting the limbs prominently the soles and palms. CT scan showed cerebral atrophy prominently on the temporal lobe bilaterally. Mental status exam was normal. Neurosyphilis was confirmed by CSF studies and patient tested positive for HIV infection. Patient was then started on aqueous crystalline benzathine penicillin G four million units every four hours for ten days and was discharged with improved condition and no neurocognitive deficits. . He was advised to have CD4 count and other work up for his HIV infection as outpatient.@*Conclusion@#The reported incidence of neurosyphilis is increasing in the advent of HIV infection. The deficiency of a clear epidemiology, pathophysiology and complications of cerebral atrophy in neurosyphilis patients co-infected with HIV necessitates further studies to elucidate the proper approach to this preventable and treatable disease.


Assuntos
Sífilis , Neurossífilis
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA